The shooting interface is similar to the X21. It is similar to the iPhone in operation, with 8 filters left, X20 and 40 before. Several bugs in X21, such as automatically disable automatic HDR when switching modes, has been fixed in NEX S. Stability has been good, no flashbacks and hangs. The slot point is still mainly concentrated on the interface is not fashion enough, not worthy of the NEX S fashion shape.
The panorama function is still easy to use, the speed is fast, the size is large, and the traces are small, and the success rate is high. The filter function shrinks, not fun enough, relatively speaking, the B&W filter is used more often.
|Testing Item||Weight||Score||Testing Item||Weight||Score|
|Image Quality||20%||90||Image Quality||30%||0|
The biggest shortcoming in NEX S imaging is details. We believe that the loss of detail caused by metering is a pity. It is not because the hardware, but the software is not good enough. This defect makes NEX S loses at least 4 points in Soomal's scoring system. The bright and lively color style is the most eye-catching feature of the NEX S. If you only look at the small picture, the NEX S is no worse than any competitor. Please keep this advantage. Because the CIS is better, the texture and layering of the NEX S is better than that of the X21, but we think it can be done better. HDR is a progressive point, and it is becoming more mature, stable and natural. The focus performance is also very good, the current first-class level is undoubted, the night street with low illumination can also try to sweep the street, the focus logic has also been improved, and it is easier to use. The screen performs well, and the visibility is excellent under strong light. After adding color management, the cross-platform reading experience is basically the same, but there are fewer devices in the P3 color gamut. The NEX S shooting experience is generally good, but the picture quality is still not up to the tier 1 level, but also need to increase the intensity to catch up.